m-chrzan.xyz
aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/blog/on-zucks-metaverse.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/blog/on-zucks-metaverse.html')
-rw-r--r--src/blog/on-zucks-metaverse.html48
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/src/blog/on-zucks-metaverse.html b/src/blog/on-zucks-metaverse.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 57c73c5..0000000
--- a/src/blog/on-zucks-metaverse.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-title: On Zuck's Metaverse — Ads Everywhere
-date: November 25, 2021 14:06
----
-<p>
-First off, let's just call it VR. "Metaverse" is a brand name invented to
-separate current efforts from the previously failed hype around VR. The reasons
-VR has failed before are interesting of themselves, but more on that in a future
-post. Here I want to talk about Zuck's ideas for social VR and what I think
-about the whole concept.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-VR as a social and communication medium, which appears to be Zuck's focus, and
-is likely to end up being one of the widest VR markets in terms of number of
-users and overall man-hour usage time, is not progress in any way. It doesn't
-actually introduce any new features that would make life better. It will never
-replace real world human connections as Zuck seems to imply it can. At least not
-until we reach Matrix-levels of simulation, but that comes with a whole host of
-other obvious problems.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Remember &mdash; it's not social media, it's marketing media. VR social media is
-simply a huge investment of developer time, and a trade off of internet
-bandwidth, to squeeze extra attention and shopfront-facing time from users. VR
-is fancy, engaging, and can probably be made to be even more addicting than the
-current flat phone screens. Just like it's hard to take your eyes off of a
-flashing TV screen, even if you're not actively interested in what's currently
-on, it will be difficult for the people that plug themselves into VR to take the
-headset off. Zuck talked a lot about interoperability of "metaverse" systems:
-this is also going to be useful from a profits perspective, by seamlessly
-guiding users (<i>useds</i> in Stallmanian terms) from a chat with friends to
-purchasing a new product.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Internet ads already replaced magazine, newspaper, radio, and to an extent even
-TV ads. By building a simulated world for people to spend time in and move
-around, Zuck (and other VR investors) could now also steal market share from
-highway billboards, sidewalk posters, and other places we encounter marketing
-while moving around the physical world.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-That's all there is to it. If you see Zuck investing billions into a new effort,
-remember that it's to see a return on investment. And for a marketing product
-like Facebook, returns come from sapping human attention.
-</p>